Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 02:30:01 GMT From: Koichiro IWAO <meta+ports@vmeta.jp> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/181345: net/tigervnc Message-ID: <201308170230.r7H2U15l073883@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/181345; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Koichiro IWAO <meta+ports@vmeta.jp> To: kaltheat <kaltheat@googlemail.com> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, meta+ports@vmeta.jp Subject: Re: ports/181345: net/tigervnc Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:19:44 +0900 Thanks for your report. The reason why tigervnc-port uses fltk from ports is, in-tree fltk was removed[1] shortly after 1.2.0 release. Actually, 1.3.0 does not includes fltk in its source tree. Probably, building tigervnc with included version of fltk does not solve the issue becasue 1.3.0 no longer includes fltk and control keys still do not work as you confirmed. I will look for the issue but I'm busy now. If you find anything about the issue, please let me know. [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/tigervnc/code/4951/tree/trunk/CMakeLists.txt?diff=4935 > Remove the in-tree versin of FLTK. Maintaining such a copy is way too > much work, and it's constantly out of sync. Let's document what the > main developers (ie Cendio) are using instead. On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:37:34PM +0200, kaltheat wrote: > Hi, > > there is also PR ports/180911 which is a patch to update net/tigervnc to newest version 1.3.0. > I've tested the patch and patched port compiles fine, but it doesn't solve PR ports/181345. > > Regards, > kaltheat > -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta <meta@vmeta.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201308170230.r7H2U15l073883>