From nobody Sun Dec 12 10:53:51 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4404418E43D1 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840::12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JBhWH6xxPz3tKL; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.org [185.220.148.12]) by uucp.dinoex.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 1BCB04f4045398 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:00:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: uucp.dinoex.org: Host uucp.dinoex.org [185.220.148.12] claimed to be uucp.dinoex.sub.de Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) with UUCP id 1BCB04cp045395; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:00:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from gate.intra.daemon.contact (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by citylink.dinoex.sub.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 1BCAsqIY069808; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:54:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@gate.intra.daemon.contact) Received: from gate.intra.daemon.contact (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by gate.intra.daemon.contact (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1BCArpM7069541 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:53:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@gate.intra.daemon.contact) Received: (from peter@localhost) by gate.intra.daemon.contact (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1BCArpFb069540; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:53:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 11:53:51 +0100 From: Peter To: Ed Maste Cc: freebsd-stable stable Subject: Re: 12.3: vt driver does not provide virtual console terminals Message-ID: References: List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 185.220.148.12; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de;) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (uucp.dinoex.org [185.220.148.12]); Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:00:07 +0100 (CET) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4JBhWH6xxPz3tKL X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org designates 2a0b:f840::12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sub.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:205376, ipnet:2a0b:f840::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 01:29:19PM -0500, Ed Maste wrote: ! On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 13:27, Peter wrote: ! > ! > There is also this error reported: ! > > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vesa, 0xffffffff80e22c00, 0) error 19 ! ! Are you trying to load vesa.ko via /boot/loader.conf or /etc/rc.d ! kld_list, or is this observed without any vesa-specific configuration? I verified now: I can reproduce the message with GENERIC 12.3 (id 70cb68e7a00, local patches removed), and no loader.conf. It appears before filesytems are mounted, so /etc/rc.d is irrelevant. Trying to load vesa.ko from loader.conf or from the loader prompt produces the same error message and then fails to boot with "vesa not found". A kernel with "device vesa" added does boot, but also produces the message. Doing "kldload vesa.ko" in single-user gives the same error message, and additionally: > sysctl_unregister_oid: failed(22) to unregister sysctl(vesa) ! > This one is widely discussed as currently not supported by vt driver, but ! > this should be related to higher resolution screen, and not virtual ! > terminals missing. Or has it something to do with each other, and is ! > it a known problem? ! ! It is not a known problem, and I believe it should be unrelated to the ! MOD_LOAD error. You can try running `pgrep -fl getty` to confirm that ! getty(8) is running on each of the vtys. Yes they are running. I can also redirect output to the ttyv*, and that works, only the output does not appear on the screens. cheerio, PMc