From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 14:01:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D7416A4CE; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:01:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from marlena.vvi.at (marlena.vvi.at [208.252.225.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2C243D1D; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from www@marlena.vvi.at) Received: from marlena.vvi.at (localhost.marlena.vvi.at [127.0.0.1]) by marlena.vvi.at (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j16I6Abc037041; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:06:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from www@marlena.vvi.at) Received: (from www@localhost) by marlena.vvi.at (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j16I64bE037040; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:06:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from www) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:06:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200502061806.j16I64bE037040@marlena.vvi.at> To: k-sasaki@ist.osaka-u.ac.jp From: "ALeine" cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: Call for comments: CoxR, a CVS/mail-lists/BTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:01:05 -0000 k-sasaki@ist.osaka-u.ac.jp wrote: > Thanks for the many feedbacks about CoxR. > We modified the CoxR based on feedback. > And so, please try CoxR function once more. > I would like to have your impressions on the above mentioned information > system as an open source expert > Any feedback including the answer of questions above, comments, suggestions, > etc are always welcome, I took a quick look, but the page does not even display properly due to bad HTML. I suggest you run a HTML validator on the page and clean up the HTML code first: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fscorpion.ics.es.osaka-u.ac.jp%2Fcgi-bin%2FCodeSearch%2Fcoxr.html > Bug Trucking System Oh come, FreeBSD 5.x does have a mutex hell going on, but to say it has so many bugs as to require a truck is absurd. :-> A smaller lorry perhaps, but a truck - definitely not. :-) It might also be a good idea to use an automated spell-check on your pages, I've noticed a number of typos such as "divelopers" and similar. ALeine ___________________________________________________________________ WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net