From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 30 17:17:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA00327 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 30 May 1998 17:17:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00322 for ; Sat, 30 May 1998 17:17:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00922; Sat, 30 May 1998 17:12:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Eivind Eklund cc: Julian Elischer , Poul-Henning Kamp , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I see one major problem with DEVFS... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 01:53:19 +0200." <19980531015319.33329@follo.net> Date: Sat, 30 May 1998 17:12:41 -0700 Message-ID: <919.896573561@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If you want to be really nice, I'd say implement a reverse mapping > from the major/minor numbers for the time being. We will (of course) > get rid of this later, but it would allow an almost completely smooth > transition to DEVFS. Thanks, I couldn't have said it better myself. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message