From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 13:49:21 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A751065672 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lee@Dilkie.com) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [IPv6:2001:470:8900::40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F88FC13 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4978:f:4bf::2] (cl-1216.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:4bf::2]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pA2Dn0AT033347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:49:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Lee@Dilkie.com) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 spock.dilkie.com pA2Dn0AT033347 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dilkie.com; s=mail; t=1320241744; bh=oMv996sBrdH3n49omyL8sPvgaTIob4fkxay84wj9z5A=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=MZq8wBfA9nryvR9rVwRibxfZf7mlJ8y/defJy8aCPdy40OqMBNcNX7UWEHfCZvOpF qsoN3rH192rXJ1Czm/7yv4NawtZ6RlGyKjq2etE1YDgHudOZeJ8Yasaxy+Dfxqk Message-ID: <4EB14A47.8010107@Dilkie.com> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:48:55 +0000 From: Lee Dilkie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Kalchev References: <20111102131311.GA56941@icarus.home.lan> <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg> In-Reply-To: <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on IPv6:2001:470:8900::40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:49:21 -0000 On 11/2/2011 1:36 PM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > On 02.11.11 15:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: >>> Today I?ve come across an issue long ago forgotten :) Running out of >>> i-nodes. >> [...] >> >> There's a reason /usr on FreeBSD defaults to "all the remaining space on >> the disk" if you pick the defaults/auto. Surprise. :-) >> >> The summarised version is: >> >> 1. You have control over this yourself: newfs(8) -i flag. You can even >> input this flag during sysinstall when building a new system. >> >> [...] > > Just for the completeness of it, one would use ZFS and be done with > this issue. :-) Are you suggesting that ZFS be the default FS? My only concern with ZFS is that it still appears to be in flux and have some issues. I don't know, from monitoring this list, if those are issues that heavy load users experience and ZFS is as stable as UFS or if it isn't. I just know I see issues being raised. -lee