From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 31 19:50:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.xmission.com (mail.xmission.com [198.60.22.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF314DB4; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 19:50:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.39] (helo=softweyr.com) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11Alhu-0007iN-00; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:50:39 -0600 Message-ID: <37A3B5FD.78733187@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:50:37 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brian F. Feldman" Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Brian F. Feldman" wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > > > In that case, my argument changes to: > > "There's no good reason not to have bpf in the GENERIC kernel." > > And how about having > if (securelevel > 3) > return (EPERM); > in bpf_open()? I like this. Nice one, Greenie! ;^) Now stop replying to yourself, it's too much like... -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://softweyr.com/ wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message