From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 01:33:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7F1065673 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9FD8FC2A for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:33:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darko.listsniffer@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 8so15545516agc.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=cA7T5Ejz9Yx6A9ErR0dbD694AvekBTsSl6pPbGklTTY=; b=XHXaBIP/mK2L4anjffZorOQd9Uc1Jk7qXoeGENejKGg3rxCYNhER+k5V/wjYsLNdty +NWsBEx39pyJLBKyLVgmcXL1fIAwoxBT4SaSeZy4TtOgg8U2JhY5Vs9dxd1uQMAwZFxX +PWA3H3XWJRKKbdvHZlEYZLP0Y/8KNHiF9XaY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=k/FM7d5eMHzCe8MMcDWJeCqa5nSu0oi5wLGaETkQC9h5+lgdIGjLUk5WFElbVf6+zR qUB2U5q154+Jzb2y/mHx5F3zFS2d79UODt/7GjnrGkkFRrXtxStWqtvjwXHvs/XByKzt 5KYJeQ4nA1o/vp2AtI0ZRfQCCh8M8pyjY4tRY= Received: by 10.101.1.12 with SMTP id d12mr725050ani.31.1216863180955; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.201.7 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f3feb90807231833k3efedd54l28b952763d0e21cf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:33:00 -0400 From: darko To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" In-Reply-To: <200807232206.m6NM6vOT085271@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080723215917.GA64673@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <200807232206.m6NM6vOT085271@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Roland Smith , Derek Belrose , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: Port Management on a larger scale X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:33:02 -0000 On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > 2) Taking down or a failure of the NFS server pulls EVERY > other system with it. ..just thinking out loud here...but.. what if you had 2 identical NFS/rsync servers and used them together in a standby/failover method. i.e. when you have to bring down one NFS/rsync server, you direct all clients to the other and vice versa. > > 3) Working with lockd/statd can be problematic at times. > 4) NFS on FreeBSD varies (I'M TOLD) between versions as to > effectiveness, issues, etc. > 5) I've run into issues where some programs are just NOT > happy running over NFS (hylafax for me for example. POTENTIALLY a locking > issue, but running a locking tester shows everything fine, but it > just for the life of it won't work over NFS for me atleast). > > Since this is a "personal" system, I put up with it. When > I get the time/energy I'm going to break all the systems apart. > > Tuc/TBOH > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- regards, dg "..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ..." -- M.W.Lucas