From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 31 03:01:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA10827 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 03:01:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA10822 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 03:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.56.80]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA661D for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:01:28 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:10:08 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: ldconfig and libraries Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi people, I just want to verify a few things before I go off ranting about broken stuff in CURRENT. are libraries in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib tied to naming standards? for example, is this an accepted name for ldconfig: libgmodule-1.1.so.12.0 Also, should a library have special permissions? Every library found by ldconfig in the specified paths should be reported back with ldconfig -r, right? What would cause ldconfig to skip libraries? thanks to those who can answer parts or whole of my mail. If relevant configuration parts of this system are needed, feel free to ask... --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven It's a Dance of Energy, asmodai(at)wxs.nl when the Mind goes Binary... Network/Security Specialist *BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message