Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:24:47 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: invalid label -- what is expected? (solved) Message-ID: <fo9rha$2u3$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <86lk5zy5a4.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20080204092150.vprsphymqoog8cw4@webmail.leidinger.net> <20080204194936.thzddva9a8s4cwsg@webmail.leidinger.net> <86lk5zy5a4.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > I've been toying with the idea of writing a gnop-like geom that allows a > disk to be referenced by its serial number if the underlying driver is > able to supply it. That would bypass glabel's disk-shrinking issue when > working on whole disks. I agree with the idea, but why not extend glabel instead? It's already in GENERIC and I would (as an end-user) expect to find the support for this mode of usage in it :) This could lead to "interesting" situations - where a drive/slice has a UFS label, a disk ID label and (if pushed...) a "native glabel" label. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHqHGvldnAQVacBcgRAmRVAKDKtK+7eKsloX5YWaNtQqSTbSNeBQCgg/Ll sUSYBlRHIuHqIChLUwIwObo= =jRWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fo9rha$2u3$1>