From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 6 11:23:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA15863 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 11:23:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.websidestory.com (mail.websidestory.com [209.75.20.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA15845 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vansax@mail.websidestory.com) Received: from localhost (vansax@localhost) by mail.websidestory.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA11578; Wed, 6 May 1998 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Van Baalen To: Dan Nelson cc: Nicole , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Appropriate 100bt NIC for NFS In-Reply-To: <19980506122818.A10083@emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are you dropping packets on both NICs, or just one? Make sure your > NICs and your switch agree on half/full duplex negotiating. If one end I have hardwired FDX on the switches, but don't know how to tell what the Intel EE chose. Pointers? I am concerned about this because I see collisions bash-2.01$ netstat -i -w 5 input (Total) output packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls 6878 0 945830 7468 0 1961878 298 6717 0 969310 6776 0 1475529 223 7164 0 973877 7282 0 1634156 222 6362 0 939102 6473 0 1502455 180 7332 0 1021859 7423 0 1583231 224 I shouldn't see collisions if both sides are FDX?? Otherwise the card seems happy (no packet loss etc). Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message