From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 11:41:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42F216A41A for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from dd17730.kasserver.com (dd17730.kasserver.com [85.13.138.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F67813C447 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-222.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.222]) by dd17730.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1148318202893 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 81BCD1521E; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:40:08 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:40:08 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1202038808 58932 192.168.100.5 (3 Feb 2008 11:40:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 11:40:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.3-STABLE (sparc64)) Subject: Re: Looking for a Text on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:41:45 -0000 On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:38:49 -0600 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > ZFS ends the microsotf monopoly over our disks. And this monopoly is founded on ... what? > ZFS begins the world as a 128bit dadaspace. > Using ZFS fixes allocations and massaging your NAS. > The inode is now the wenode. > Usaging ZFS will make everything sunnier. > Brighter too. > Making ZFS the default FS in an FScentric world ends > the pesky problems associated with legacy hardware. > Building a ZFS nonuplyindirectwenode multiply redundant > redundant filesystem makes Kate Miller-Heidke the > Well, the best, I think. I take ist, you don't approve of ZFS? :-) Regards, Chris