From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 10:30:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA121065677 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C419D8FC19 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1IAU3tg092172 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n1IAU30H092167; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200902181030.n1IAU30H092167@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/131800: [jail] rpcbind(8) fails to start in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:30:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/131800; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rob@debank.tv Cc: Subject: Re: bin/131800: [jail] rpcbind(8) fails to start in jail Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Hi, this jail behaviour will soon change again that opening an IPv6 socket will be possible w/o the IP though this currently matches the behavior of the base system. The problem here seems to be that (without looking at the code) rpcbind is not checking return codes properly. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.