From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 17:19:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A69683; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACFC8FC12; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA29617; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <50CB5FA2.6050104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:30 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r244112 - head/sys/kern References: <201212110708.qBB78EWx025288@svn.freebsd.org> <201212121046.43706.jhb@freebsd.org> <201212121658.49048.jhb@freebsd.org> <50C90567.8080406@FreeBSD.org> <50C909BD.9090709@mu.org> <50C97D94.1090603@FreeBSD.org> <50C97F8D.6010504@FreeBSD.org> <50C9A321.5060407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:19:33 -0000 on 13/12/2012 19:01 mdf@FreeBSD.org said the following: > Tools, not policy. > > A non-panic-ing KASSERT is a tool, not enabled by default. You don't > need to use it. Someone does, so why can't we provide the tool? So if some code is a tool and it is disabled by default and someone believes that they will use it, then the code is acceptable to include into the tree no questions asked? -- Andriy Gapon