From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 11 13:45: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.dellroad.org (adsl-63-194-81-26.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.81.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F7737B403 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arch20m.dellroad.org (arch20m.dellroad.org [10.1.1.20]) by InterJet.dellroad.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA19884; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from archie@localhost) by arch20m.dellroad.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f9BKclh17562; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200110112038.f9BKclh17562@arch20m.dellroad.org> Subject: Re: strange results with increased net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20011011121308.053ddc20@marble.sentex.ca> "from Mike Tancsa at Oct 11, 2001 12:19:01 pm" To: Mike Tancsa Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Luigi Rizzo , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ jumping into the middle of this discussion... ] Mike Tancsa writes: > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen from 50 to 100. and there didnt seem to be > any positive results in terms of lessening the rate of > net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops. This is consistent with the situation where packets are received at a rate faster than they are being consumed. No matter how big your queue is, it's going to fill up eventually and overflow, and all you're doing by increasing the queue length is adding latency to all of those packets that you do process. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message