From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 18:48:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-sysinstall@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178B21065670 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com) Received: from mx1.fisglobal.com (mx1.fisglobal.com [199.200.24.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D38FC0A for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (ltcfislmsgpa02 [127.0.0.1]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0KIQSX0017566; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:48:52 -0600 Received: from smtp.fisglobal.com ([10.132.206.16]) by ltcfislmsgpa02.fnfis.com with ESMTP id 12fd5904b8-14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:48:52 -0600 Received: from dtwin (10.14.152.15) by smtp.fisglobal.com (10.132.206.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:48:27 -0600 From: Devin Teske To: Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:48:52 -0800 Message-ID: <059301ccd7a4$2c47c090$84d741b0$@fisglobal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AczXnn8P3JJQMJ/TQEyfJ56qdK43pA== Content-Language: en-us X-Originating-IP: [10.14.152.15] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7361, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-20_04:2012-01-20, 2012-01-20, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 Cc: Chad Perrin , Robison , devin.teske@fisglobal.com, Dave Subject: Offering sysinstall(8) as a choice in the FreeBSD 9 installation media X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:48:56 -0000 Long ago (on this list) it was previously discussed (and a consensus was reached) that the FreeBSD 9 installer should have two offerings to achieve two high-level goals: 1. Ease the transition from sysinstall(8) to bsdinstall 2. Gradually "vet" bsdinstall over time (over the next 2 or 3 major releases -- 8/9 or 8/9/10, where either one of 10 or 11 will be free of sysinstall). The process of integrating sysinstall(8) into the current RELENG_9 installer is not difficult and I am volunteering. The choice for selecting sysinstall versus bsdinstall will be presented to the user during the kernel options menu. See the following two pictures to get an idea: Picture 1 showing a proposed menu-addition to the RELENG_9 installer, defaulting to bsdinstall http://twitpic.com/89l2ub/full Picture 2 showing sysinstall selected by the user: http://twitpic.com/89l4n6/full Choosing bsdinstall (or simply allowing the timer to reach zero and boot, as bsdinstall would be the default) would result in booting directly into the ISO0-9660 structure as is currently done by the 9.0-RELEASE media. Choosing sysinstall on the other-hand, would result in booting into the mfsroot structure that sysinstall(8) has always used. Later down the road, when bsdinstall becomes feature-complete and/or is stable enough to replace sysinstall, the menu option simply goes away. -- Devin P.S. With consensus reached, we'll then take this discussion to re@ _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.