Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:50:52 +0200 From: Terje Elde <terje@elde.net> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> Cc: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>, Maciej Suszko <maciej@suszko.eu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysvipc only for one jail Message-ID: <25DF7BAC-14CC-4481-BAC1-0DBBF0E0D92C@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308121928480.90799@mail.fig.ol.no> References: <CAO%2BPfDe3VDRpK9ALrsvwxBcAyejfN85FRvMLU3Q4CKmMgkG3%2BA@mail.gmail.com> <20130811173341.6d1cb2e7@arsenic> <20130811173630.24ed528c@arsenic> <CAO%2BPfDct3aXrrszdWOOu7KUPaxVKrPvboJJn29ipKUS9pCo%2B_g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308121323550.90799@mail.fig.ol.no> <CAO%2BPfDfunKiUx=2SV678jZqzwWHoVPonUwi_MMyNvSJ_HCiUuQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308121407470.90799@mail.fig.ol.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1308121928480.90799@mail.fig.ol.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12. aug. 2013, at 19.46, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote: > If you start the jail manually using jail(8), then /etc/jail.conf=20 > comes into play, whereas the lines in /etc/rc.conf is used during=20 > automatic startup of the jails when the host is rebooted. The whole=20 > arrangement seems unnecessary redundant, and I truly wish this can be=20= > merged sooner rather than later. It *is* unnecessary redundant. If you're using /etc/rc.conf to define the jails, then start them with: /etc/rc.d/jail start jailname That is, if you're mostly using /etc/rc.conf to define the jails, then = start them manually using that as well? Problem solved? Terje
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25DF7BAC-14CC-4481-BAC1-0DBBF0E0D92C>