From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 12:59:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C66E1065672; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shino@fornext.org) Received: from juniper.fornext.org (juniper.fornext.org [61.194.3.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670C18FC18; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shino@fornext.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (thyme.fornext.org [192.168.2.32]) by juniper.fornext.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC562E021; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:42:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:42:35 +0900 From: Shunsuke SHINOMIYA To: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20080626.173915.115767618.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <200806260820.m5Q8K40p017875@freefall.freebsd.org> <20080626.173915.115767618.hrs@allbsd.org> Message-Id: <20080626192225.9813.A2D40D1E@fornext.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.47 [ja] Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: kern/125003: incorrect EtherIP header format. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:59:34 -0000 Hi Hiroki-san, > I do not think our current implementation has interoperability issue > here because eip_ver is always used with ETHER_IP_VER_*_MASK. Could > you please elaborate more specific case? First of all, my fix last submitted was wrong way to solve the problem that I noticed. In current implementation, 0x03 is transmitted, and, next, 0x00 is transmitted as version(3) and reserved(0x000) field. But I think that 0x30 should be transmitted first from RFC3378. -- Shunsuke SHINOMIYA