From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 23:21:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D34116A418 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leimy2k@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044E413C48E for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leimy2k@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1652358rvb for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=plu3cm+hGJfqPhcHKJw9pRHMKwXYa8uoSZbUCNH8nHw=; b=e9EIhEvt5PKlf0DhOWeJBqtVdRtwcpbHB1SD+FjCfZCvHthDLi+IlSJnW2QJHA0kSIcElyHsq9RHjMZ5KJkQ26sWVY7aLRzAeJ6V2hkNIP+f0k1gncpdpLbI++0NwJZzG/Tz8Z5nQYfonjGmBeryX/p4xeYXoK8kFMAtY+H5Jls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Fcp/fOSO9Hj9sLxmaDmJXtyjl+cMjYx3Sho7Qghe/Ye2+hbKZK0Z7nPASo0TUbyvNb4a7MUUbLYjv2PTJJANAnJ4xH/zJveaWQaCWpX/3JZS26N66XUckUOwVMi/2bphcFcF4lxmCpJxfzrPBXmX2fpec2ZKXxTSlNdx2AKBcfg= Received: by 10.141.23.7 with SMTP id a7mr4577565rvj.1192663299248; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.197.6 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3e1162e60710171621s3e9cec0am66ab88dc5dfcf528@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:21:39 -0700 From: "David Leimbach" To: "Steve Kargl" In-Reply-To: <20071017224049.GA48997@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <132802.25776.qm@web33711.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20071017173941.GT5411@hoeg.nl> <20071017182758.GU5411@hoeg.nl> <20071017203438.GA37057@freebsd.org> <3e1162e60710171428i1c28c7a5ha285a4d4ea8f5ce5@mail.gmail.com> <20071017215241.GA97384@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3e1162e60710171525m6d6b3ecey6b797fa3b245b88@mail.gmail.com> <20071017224049.GA48997@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Roman Divacky , FreeBSD Current , Ed Schouten , Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Subject: Re: PCC and FreeBSD in the future? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:21:40 -0000 On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > On 10/17/07, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:28:01PM -0700, David Leimbach wrote: > > > > > > http://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#license > > > > Google's not broken at all thanks... First hit for llvm-gcc shows the > > following. > > > > And, the first hit of llvm is the llvm home page. Read it and > the FAQ link above and you'll find that llvm isn't derived from > GCC. Already knew that. I was querying about llvm-gcc. Sorry that I was too terse to make that clear originally. > > That fact that the llvm project uses the GCC C/C++ frontends > does not means that llvm is a derivative of GCC. Yeah, I guess I was hoping that would have been inferred by my question about the parts that were derived from gcc. Still, I shouldn't have been so snarky in my comments back to you. But then I really thought you were asking for it with the google comment. Especially since I'm using a gmail address. I apologize for my terse, difficult to understand question, and my snarkiness. I hope you can accept that. I don't want to start yet another pissing match on a FreeBSD mailing list. :-) Dave PS: I actually do use llvm-gcc on Mac OS X