From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 30 0:30:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id 900BE37B401; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:30:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 00:30:44 -0800 From: Juli Mallett To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Peter Wemm , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is netstat b?rked? Message-ID: <20030130003044.B27880@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030129140750.A89505@FreeBSD.org> <20030130082428.GB22684@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030130082428.GB22684@sunbay.com>; from ru@freebsd.org on Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:24:28AM +0200 Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , , X-Towel: Yes X-LiveJournal: flata, jmallett X-Negacore: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * De: Ruslan Ermilov [ Data: 2003-01-30 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Is netstat b?rked? ] > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:07:50PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote: > > ref5% netstat -na -p tcp > > ref5% > > > > dalek# netstat -an -p tcp > > dalek# > > > Both beast and ref5 are from Jan 4 and exhibit this problem; > builder, which is from Jan 28, doesn't. > > Perhaps, someone updated the kernel and forgot to update the > userland, or vice versa? No, a modern kernel fixes it. Apparently the kernel was really broken since I first started seeing this (which means that it is in 5.0-R too????). Kernel build took as long as it did for your reply :) I kinda doubted it was that, since my kernel was only 6 days old. Thanx, juli. -- Juli Mallett AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message