From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 2 21:23:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311F2A13; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D98D61A7C; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wo20so3751507obc.5 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=84EXoGauMg+1MLYJP8h5QotbtC/BIAh9Ed/GURfTra4=; b=E0ONx7T1qP1emLDFXD2SirQ8NYCOFmCufv4j7R3b1nt1R37IMGYrIbY1xZEOVBBEIF 8Oak7tm/Q5J1E8oqv8V3eNxME8z4aZ9FAR4+/oqFjOau6jnR+mjMJ1F3/z34dacu6Tsx qfZC2ibnje0BYvNsiE299ogXlamVxOX3nO/ytR3UM+x1JdpvsqBJC5kR4TvvZOj/d47X q1KuheEw+Udft3T8DtHrkiHP9YEXDYKSmGLcSEJVSa0Y7kPxBcRz0EId4N/kyTx3QZuc qelZQTmKv0xz9EhkjbEXYcM8yLAq4audr/dF1OCgSi3L18Dj2n+xxkLWU1oQq0LlAgdY dp2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.19.164 with SMTP id g4mr275396obe.58.1393795412084; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.78.71 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <530EBCDB.1090303@delphij.net> <53138FA6.1060705@delphij.net> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:23:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UDP Lite support From: Joe Nosay To: Xin LI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:23:33 -0000 On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA512 >>>> >>>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote: >>>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been >>>> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged >>>> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure >>>> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context. What is the >>>> >>>>>> question? What thread are you referring to? If this is >>>> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more >>>> >>>>>> appropriate than -current. >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> -- Brooks >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on >>>> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the >>>> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> > >>>> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html >>>> > >>>> > Looks >>>> >>>>> >>>> > like nobody proposed a patch? >>>> > >>>> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world >>>> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that >>>> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self >>>> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other >>>> > operating systems. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma >>>> >> >>>> >> Not my project; but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to >>>> >> get it to build from source. Use your raspberry pi with FreeBSD >>>> >> to broadcast your tunes and all. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to >>>> > improve the code. >>>> >>>> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing >>>> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc: >>>> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff >>>> >>>> Are you interested in working on these and report back? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd >>>> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc >>>> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA >>>> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz >>>> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D >>>> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W >>>> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S >>>> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT >>>> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m >>>> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI >>>> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU >>>> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia >>>> =2Vmc >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>> >>> >>> I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with >>> the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping >>> it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory. >>> Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right? >>> >> One not one in first sentence. Insert hurt between not & when in last >> sentence. >> >> I'm doing patch -p *.diff and the process is taking some time. What am I > doing wrong? > Syntax. Rebuild reinstall the source portions in common then find an application that uses udplite, right? "Duhhhh." Thanks. "Yuhhh"