From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue May 27 16:45:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA10323
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 27 May 1997 16:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [204.160.242.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA10318
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 May 1997 16:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harlie.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [204.160.242.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA21816 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 May 1997 16:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 16:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Contemplating my next port
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970527154239.19969A-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


My first port was so easy (ha!), thought I'd do another one.  I have to
make 5.1b of libwww work at work, and only found two problems out of the
box, so figured might as well roll a port of it.  The first problem
was a minor issue of missing parens.

The second was a missing define, O_SYNC.  Now, I did find O_FSYNC, but
without a reference for O_SYNC, I'm not sure it's the same thing. SunOS
merely defines O_SYNC as /* synchronized file update option */, as opposed
to O_DSYNC, /* synchronized data update option */

So, do I just patch O_SYNC to O_FSYNC?