Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:25:37 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: QUICK RESPONCE NEEDED: Netscape 4.72 handling Message-ID: <20000229002537.A57515@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000227192450.D21819@shadow.blackdawn.com>; from andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM on Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 07:24:50PM -0500 References: <20000227191320.B21819@shadow.blackdawn.com> <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002271817220.3431-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> <20000227192450.D21819@shadow.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 07:24:50PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > The problem with making strong encryption a knob is the same reason > > you state below. We won't have the packages for them anymore and > > Mr. O'Brien will probably be a mite bit upset over that. :) I'm a "Mr." now. Wow I'm getting old. :-) > I thought about this. But I came up with the gotcha: How can you distribute > packages if they contain strong encryption? :-) One can distribute them within the USA all they want -- ie, within a company or organization. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000229002537.A57515>