From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 9 10:05:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870FD106564A; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from murankar@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: from amazone1.ujf-grenoble.fr (amazone1.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.238.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315368FC1A; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr (tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.24.147]) by amazone1.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.13.7/8.13.7/Configured by JE/GB 2010-12-10) with ESMTP id p299Cnwl021963; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44592E010; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:48 +0100 (CET) X-UJF-AV: Scanned on tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr Received: from tibre1.ujf-grenoble.fr (tibre1.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.24.148]) by tana1.ujf-grenoble.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B750D2E00F; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr (iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.59.35]) by tibre1.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/SyS-1.10) with ESMTP id p299CkV8006404; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from murankar@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: from iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p299CkMv082137; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from murankar@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr) Received: (from murankar@localhost) by iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p299CkUr082136; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from murankar) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:12:46 +0100 From: Urankar Mikael To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20110309091246.GC3530@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> References: <20110305084520.GB2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> <20110305163034.GD2833@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> <20110309073523.GA3530@iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Net , freebsd-current , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:05:14 -0000 Yes ! On Wed 09 March 2011 at 04:58:50PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > So you're saying -head is better, right? > > On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar Mikael wrote: > > > Here are some dumb benchmarks through ftp : > > > > with 8.2R RX rate is 2400kBps and TX rate is 810KBps > > on a 9-CURRENT RX rate is 2700kBps and TX rate is 2700kBps > > > > More info on my system : > > ath0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x5b001385 chip=0x0013168c > > rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' > > device = '802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter (AR2312)' > > > > ath0: mem 0x88000000-0x8800ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on > > cardbus0 > > ath0: AR2413 mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5 > > > > FreeBSD iut-mir-o.ujf-grenoble.fr 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #39 > > r219368M: Mon Mar 7 12:15:50 CET 2011 > > > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/ah_osdep.c 219315 2011-03-05 21:20:18Z adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c 219185 2011-03-02 17:19:54Z adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_debug.c 218058 2011-01-29 05:08:21Z > > adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_keycache.c 219185 2011-03-02 17:19:54Z > > adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_pci.c 192147 2009-05-15 17:02:11Z imp $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_sysctl.c 219180 2011-03-02 16:03:19Z > > adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c 218932 2011-02-22 00:37:53Z adrian $ > > $FreeBSD: head/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx_ht.c 219214 2011-03-03 03:02:06Z > > adrian $ > > > > > > On Sun 06 March 2011 at 05:02:38AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > What was the previous performance? And which chipsets? > > > > > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > On 6 March 2011 00:30, Urankar Mikael > >wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything! > > > > > > > > > > Adrian > > > > > > > > > > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael < > > mikael.urankar@ujf-grenoble.fr > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd > > really > > > > > > > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed > > a > > > > few > > > > > > bugs > > > > > > > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced > > > > regressions. > > > > > > I'd > > > > > > > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in > > > > > > > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I haven't > > > > > > > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in any > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n > > support, > > > > but I > > > > > > > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy operation in > > any > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you interested by tests on an old atheros card (Atheros 5212, > > > > AR2413 > > > > > > mac 7.9 RF2413 phy 4.5) ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything seems to work fine, performances are as good as before. > > > > I'm only doing basic stuff with this card (mostly web surfing), I'm > > > > connected to an AP with WPA encryption. If you want me to test other > > > > encryption or setup an AP with this card or whatever, feel free to ask. > > > > > > > > And thanks for you work !