Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:19:44 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net> Subject: Re: Validating docbook articles... Message-ID: <20040224151944.GU45593@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <403A53E1.2040305@mac.com> References: <8D03FA54-4BA6-11D8-8D97-003065ABFD92@pkix.net> <20040216130659.GC617@submonkey.net> <4031364A.2070708@pkix.net> <20040222181114.GB32524@graf.pompo.net> <40390248.1060104@pkix.net> <4039D0FE.3010905@FreeBSD.org> <xzpd686huyw.fsf@dwp.des.no> <403A53E1.2040305@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JEhTuUFIcUlI65CC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > >Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >>[ ...talking about -preserve in tidy... ] > >This reminds me of the many good reasons to convert the doc tree to > >XML. One of these is that xmllint can both validate input files and > >clean up output files, and it does a far better job of it than tidy. >=20 > An interesting idea. I took a quick look at converting an existing SGML= =20 > document into XML in order to gain some idea as to the work involved. Check the archives for some working patches (then, at least) that I posted here approximately 18 months ago. As I recall, they were met with awe-inspiring indifference. Ceri --=20 --JEhTuUFIcUlI65CC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAO2uQocfcwTS3JF8RAlcsAJ91PKr8nIx0817DjqI4Kb34wWdXwgCfVft6 8eTpD4OqJqQfBFsJHWsb3sI= =zJ91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JEhTuUFIcUlI65CC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224151944.GU45593>