Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:07:52 -0400
From:      Bill Vermillion <bv@wjv.com>
To:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HTTP Load Balancing and Availability Solutions
Message-ID:  <20020424200752.GF89347@wjv.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10204240824450.6896-100000@misery.sdf.com>
References:  <1019656776.38204.17.camel@xyzzy.intranet.snsonline.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10204240824450.6896-100000@misery.sdf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-segmentation fault- 
press any key to reboot 
Damn damn damn Tom Samplonius said, after restarting his 
PC and mailer on Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:31 .

> 
> On 24 Apr 2002, Mark Sergeant wrote:
> 
> > 99.999 is less than an hours down time per year which running off one
> ...
> 
>   I don't get that:
> 
> 365 days per year x 24 hours per day x 60 minutes per hour = 525,600
> minutes per year
> 
> 525,600 minutes per year x 0.001 percent down = 525.6 minutes per year 
> down
> 
> 
>   I think you might be thinking of 99.9999% reliability, which would be
> 52.5 minutes per year.

>   Usually, when I hear people talk about 4 nine reliability, they are
> talking about the decimal portion.  I believe banks and telephone
> companies operate on a 4 nines reliability basis.

Five nines.  99.99999  is the standard for telcos, etc.  The
highend bank machines such as Tandem are often speced to six 9's.
Now THAT is serious.  
-- 
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020424200752.GF89347>