From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 3 12:10:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz (mta.xtra.co.nz [203.96.92.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF7D1548E for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 12:10:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker ([210.55.152.128]) by mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v04.00.02.07 201-227-108) with SMTP id <19990503191224.EYKW7099562.mta2-rme@wocker> for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 07:12:24 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" Organization: The FreeBSD Diary To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 07:10:20 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: ssh vs ssh2 Reply-To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990503191224.EYKW7099562.mta2-rme@wocker> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was told that most people won't want/need ssh2 and that people should use ssh unless they are told they need ssh2. Is that true? If so, why? cheers -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/ NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/ The Racing System - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message