From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 10:37:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB6E1065716; Mon, 26 May 2008 10:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24888FC26; Mon, 26 May 2008 10:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m4QAPL7d036283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 May 2008 12:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.14.2/8.13.1/Submit) id m4QAPLfM036282; Mon, 26 May 2008 12:25:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 12:25:21 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka To: vwe@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20080526102520.GA34751@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <200805232212.m4NMCpXG082056@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805232212.m4NMCpXG082056@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 147.229.8.12 Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/93634: [msdosfs] False access to renamed files/directories (case bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:37:01 -0000 vwe@FreeBSD.org wrote (2008/05/23): > Rudolf, I've found your old problem report still open. Sorry nobody took > care. > Can you please provide information if your issue is still a problem > with later releases (say 6.3, 7.0, post6.3 6-STABLE or 7-STABLE)? > Please note 5.x and pre-6.3 releases will be EOL'd soon. Hello, yes, I have re-tested it on 6.3-STABLE as of Mar 01, 2008, and the problem is still here and it is very easily reproducible. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic