From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 07:12:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB9A16A477 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:12:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from frontmail.ipactive.de (frontmail.maindns.de [85.214.95.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A1713C44B for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from mail.vtec.ipme.de (Q7d7c.q.ppp-pool.de [89.53.125.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by frontmail.ipactive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73144128844 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:39:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from cesar.sz.vwsoft.com (cesar.sz.vwsoft.com [192.168.16.3]) by mail.vtec.ipme.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2573F443 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:37:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47B3E21F.1010202@vwsoft.com> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:39:27 +0100 From: Volker User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1203575884.25976@swJCVhKLy/f2+CshRFrHBQ X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com X-ipactive-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ipactive-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ipactive-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com Cc: Subject: licensing question APSL X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:12:21 -0000 While working through the PR backlog, I found two PRs filed containing source code for two tools (decomment, relpath) under the Apple Public Source License (APSL). I think these tools aren't that bad but before pinging any committer with that, I thought I might throw the question on the table: What about importing code under the APSL license? Has there been any consensus in the past about that license? I'm not a lawyer but the license seems to be reasonable suited for the BSD projects. PRs in question: bin/67307 bin/67308 PR submitter is the author of the tools. Thanks Volker