From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 18:34:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8283C16A41F; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:34:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0243D46; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.50.41.234] (Not Verified[10.50.41.234]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:51:05 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: Jung-uk Kim Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:34:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E0323D7B6@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <200510280958.59985.jhb@freebsd.org> <200510281231.43130.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200510281231.43130.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510281434.41236.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Mathieu Prevot Subject: Re: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:34:18 -0000 On Friday 28 October 2005 12:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > > In fact, I have seen somebody else had similar problem: > > > > > > > > http://bsdforum.or.kr/viewtopic.php?p=5414#5414 > > > > > > > > It's Korean BSD User Forum but you may be able to read this: > > > > > > > > pci_link26: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.1.INTA is invalid > > > > pci_link21: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.2.INTA is invalid > > > > pci_link27: BIOS IRQ 3 for -2145771032.2.INTB is invalid > > > > pci_link23: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.10.INTA is invalid > > > > pci_link24: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.4.INTA is invalid > > > > pci_link29: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.7.INTA is invalid > > > > pci_link30: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.8.INTA is invalid > > > > > > Yes, I agree that this alone doesn't fix it. This looks to me > > > like the pci_link code is pointing the interrupt source at the > > > wrong part of the resource descriptor. Perhaps it is not > > > incrementing the pointer correctly for 64-bit arches. > > > > > >From the actual code: > > > > /* Validate the BIOS IRQ. */ > > if (!link_valid_irq(link, bios_irq)) { > > device_printf(dev, "BIOS IRQ %u for %d.%d.INT%c is invalid\n", > > bios_irq, pcib_get_bus(pcib), slot, pin + 'A'); > > > > Thus, the weird value is being retuned by pcib_get_bus(), it's not > > coming out of ACPI at all. ACPI dosen't provide bus numbers, just > > the slot and pin, we have to extract the bus number from the ACPI > > device that has a _PRT object. what's really odd is that he is even > > getting valid-looking IRQs, since we use pcib_get_bus() as the bus > > number for configuration transactions. It's probably getting > > truncated down to the low byte at some point and thus reading the > > wrong bus, hence getting invalid IRQs I guess. The real question > > here is why pcib_get_bus() is broken on this bridge. > > Please note that the message I posted is not from the same chipset, i. > e., nForce4 chipset. The only common thing here is Athlon64/Sempron > with Award BIOS. Maybe the BIOS is culprit here? Shrug... pcib_get_bus() being broken is not really a BIOS issue, that's some sort of FreeBSD bug that needs to be tracked down I think. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org