From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:52:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB47116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com (imo-m27.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F82843D54 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id n.fa.2e69790 (16781) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:54 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:53 EDT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 -0000 While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test Freebsd 4.9 against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on separate drives. The simple test was as follows: Hardware: Celeron 2.4Ghz processor Dual onboard Intel (em) NICs, 32bit, 33Mhz bus Setup: Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server I had it set up to route between the 2 interfaces (ie NOT bridged). I fired a unidirectional stream of UDP packets (so there was no return traffic from the server, which was discarding the packets) at a rate of ~100Kpps. The disturbing results: FreeBSD 4.9: 33% interrupt usage FreeBSD 5.2.1: >80% interrupt usage What has happened to the stack?