Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:47:59 -0600 From: Jeremy Norris <ishmael27@home.com> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: $FreeBSD$ in pkg-plist (was Re: ports/32037: New port: pm-lib) Message-ID: <20011122024759.GA8664@babylon.merseine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20011119083417.C81774@databits.net> References: <200111190520.fAJ5K2t67168@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011119083417.C81774@databits.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 08:34:17AM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote: > ++ 18/11/01 21:20 -0800 - Jeremy Norris: > | Please use this shar instead of original (adds $FreeBSD$ to pkg-plist). > > Is this really necessary? It isn't documented anywhere and portlint > doesn't check for it. Most ports do not have this, while just a few do. > > Personally, I don't see any need for it. A few people I have talked to > tend to agree with me, too. So can we come up with a policy about this > and be consistent? > I see no harm in it being added. I believe OpenBSD does it in all of their ports. What does portmgr think? Jeremy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011122024759.GA8664>