Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:50:09 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile) Message-ID: <20080221155008.GT57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <fpk6ai$o73$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080221131209.GA2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221140247.GC2022@plan0.kaiwan.csbnet.se> <20080221143351.GP57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <fpk4fa$gj0$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080221152404.GQ57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <fpk6ai$o73$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--utW7cflQPA+9Bfvi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:47:52PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> > >>> Shall the crossbuild for CURRENT work on RELENG_[67] ? If not, this i= s a > >>> huge regression. > >> Why wouldn't it, unless you're building amd64 CURRENT on i386 > >> RELENG_[67] or a similar combination? > >> > > Exactly. >=20 > Maybe a note like "please symlink ar to gar before attempting this kind > update" would be sufficient? Or the similar notion built into the makefil= e? This is not an update. Instead, this is normal and often exercised part of the workflow. --utW7cflQPA+9Bfvi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAke9nbAACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iwtACgniiNh6hPt2gZ5eKJ6YG+VbVD dOsAoNUFMhSn9L8/5/y5EisBExVyBt9t =UHvy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --utW7cflQPA+9Bfvi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080221155008.GT57756>