From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 9 18:16:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9837416A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:16:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from grandcentral.lifeafterking.org (a.lifeafterking.org [69.55.237.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF3143D13 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:16:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mooneer@translator.cx) Received: from dyn128-54-250-252.ucsd.edu (dyn128-54-250-252.ucsd.edu [128.54.250.252]) by grandcentral.lifeafterking.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA6331BB0; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:16:21 -0800 (PST) From: Mooneer Salem To: Marko Zec In-Reply-To: <200312100014.39358.zec@tel.fer.hr> References: <20031209073926.C6D5E43D09@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1070998966.5649.6.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org> <200312100014.39358.zec@tel.fer.hr> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1071022578.16870.3.camel@dell-ucsd.lifeafterking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 09 Dec 2003 18:16:18 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Mike K Subject: Re: Multiple Ips in Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 02:16:23 -0000 Hello, Multiple IP functionality is part of the jail separation patch I made earlier this year for 5.0 while playing with using jails as a VPS solution. It includes other stuff besides multiple IP addresses; I basically used the mijail 4.x patch as a reference, changing code to refer to struct thread instead of struct proc as needed. I have everything up at http://msalem.translator.cx/dist/jail_seperation.v7.patch, if you want to look at it. Thanks, On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:14, Marko Zec wrote: > On Tuesday 09 December 2003 20:42, Mooneer Salem wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 23:39, Mike K wrote: > > > Anyone successfully get this to work in a working environment, not > > > just install? > > > > I'm thinking that this would be a better solution for a virtual > > hosting environment (once stabilized): > > http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/. In any case, I've gotten it > > working under VMWare using 5.0-RELEASE and am able to access the > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Was this a typo or have you really succeeded in porting the patch to the > 5.x branch? The original diffs are against 4.9-R, and when applied > against -CURRENT they yield almost a complete reject. > > Cheers, > > Marko >