From owner-freebsd-alpha  Mon Jan 21 14: 7:17 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B784D37B400
	for <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20092;
	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:07:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g0LM6aD37553;
	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:06:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15436.37100.122800.857652@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:06:36 -0500 (EST)
To: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely8.cicely.de>
Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.5-RC panic
In-Reply-To: <20020121230416.B71666@cicely8.cicely.de>
References: <20020121035556.D58301@cicely8.cicely.de>
	<15436.8686.765933.505738@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20020121172920.U58301@cicely8.cicely.de>
	<15436.30762.981497.880698@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20020121230416.B71666@cicely8.cicely.de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-alpha.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-alpha>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-alpha>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Bernd Walter writes:
 > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
 > > 
 > > I finally upgraded my crashbox to 4.5RC & I was able to duplicate the
 > > problem here.  I think I've fixed it with the following patch -- I
 > > like it better than the first one because it is less complex & should
 > > be faster in the common case.
 > > 
 > > I've also tested it w/an old copy of tcsh that calls the old
 > > sigreturn, so I don't think I've messed up signals.
 > > 
 > > Comments?
 > 
 > I'm not able to reproduce the problem with the second patch.
 > I did not test the first one.
 > Great to see this one fixed that quick.

I'm really surpised nobody noticed it before.

I'm building current so I can commit it there first.  Its been building all
afternoon..

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message