From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Sep 21 14:23:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f209.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225F137B422 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:23:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 14:23:23 -0700 Received: from 63.195.114.87 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 21:23:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [63.195.114.87] From: "Greg Smith" To: finlayson@live.com Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems getting WaveLAN device (wi0) working Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 21:23:23 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2000 21:23:23.0908 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C632440:01C02412] Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ross, I would argue that this is an OS problem. DOS, Win 3.1 and FreeBSD have problems here. Win95 is smart enough to deal with this gracefully under most circumstances. FreeBSD cannot give a nice report of resources already consumed. It's hard to tell if it even knows. FreeBSD sometimes seems to mis-assign resources already in use. Win95 will report exactly what resources are in use, and is smart enough to disable devices which have conflicting resource requirements, unless it is OK. Dos and Win 3.1 seem more like FreeBSD in this regard. Furthermore, PC hardware has brought us the cheap boxes which allow us to run FreeBSD; and given us the flexibility to use all sorts of nifty devices, or the option of buying commodity hardware for next to nothing. I for one am very thankful to Intel, MS , and others I don't know for engineering all this stuff to work. Anyways, that's the way I see it. Greg >Apparently, for my PC box, the I/O port range (0x240-0x360) given >in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf had some unknown conflict: The "wi0" >device would get brought up OK, but it wasn't communcating properly >with the kernel. Using a different I/O port range (0x200-0x23F) >caused "wi0" to work properly on my box. > > >The PC hardware architecture is such a fucking piece of crap! Just think >about how many man-hours around the word have been lost due to chasing down >IRQ and/or I/O port address conflicts. It's pathetic >that - in the year 2000 - we still have to deal with garbage like >this. > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message