From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 13:45:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BD9106567A for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 13:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00358FC08 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 13:45:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so4707405bwz.43 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wH9HFzXdOjdDVa5wR22+tBqaWzHm1y4ryHQnMTZ88VM=; b=Pwa/DP6SJo3LgdoX+OsInpI+AsBIaT7Rs7c4Lq/jzquCWOx4yLiQvO5sN+w4MOBQJS oO1sPQRo6JhWFEhs8e0BDr1I5OEDpbDxzKHcTQoQ3XbKU9OKDa44ob0OWUqauhAYS9PM hfB0fljIrUUaerclbX0jKXq4IUnF6MD6XrqEA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=trVWi2W9XlzajrFL25tztxbqXYHJcE15m0AZUpUTgxyXovlVddAJ1QNLki/7EIK83b 7iftYYGRhUrg/PAO4E9kYgfbBM216jVRK5VxPX6yz01kzb4Qnjpep80MpGNy5kq2nGnk H8MQFACKrbGN99ieJQ15OJ4GxviEzHCwZREcw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.77.102 with SMTP id f38mr8997bkk.62.1243431938194; Wed, 27 May 2009 06:45:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ad871310905262234s35857487xbf631bea45a018e@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A1CB002.9070904@ibctech.ca> <20090527052335.7a71bfc6.freebsd@edvax.de> <4ad871310905262234s35857487xbf631bea45a018e@mail.gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: To: Glen Barber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Polytropon , Steve Bertrand , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions -" Subject: Re: Another uptime story X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:45:41 -0000 2009/5/27 Glen Barber : > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> Maybe there's a way of patching the uptime utility that it adds >> the previous uptime of the system (since last shutdown) to the >> actual uptime. I know this denies everything uptime stands for, >> let's call it accumulated uptime. :-) >> > > I like that idea, actually.. Not for faking cumulative uptime. =A0It'd > be kinda nice knowing how long a particular machine has been 'alive' > without looking through service tag records. > > -- > Glen Barber How about: [chris@amnesiac]~% ls -l /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key.pub -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 324 Apr 15 2008 /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key.pub [chris@amnesiac]~% I think I'd cry if I were to lose 553 days of uptime.... Chris --=20 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?