From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Oct 4 14:48:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.6.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571BB37B503 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA16028; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:46:36 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr06.primenet.com(206.165.6.206) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpdAAA0jaamF; Wed Oct 4 14:46:27 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA03066; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:47:56 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200010042147.OAA03066@usr06.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Lucent modems question To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr (Giorgos Keramidas) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 21:47:56 +0000 (GMT) Cc: keichii@peorth.iteration.net (Michael C . Wu), chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001004223929.B32669@hades.hell.gr> from "Giorgos Keramidas" at Oct 04, 2000 10:39:29 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Lucent seems to have released a winmodem driver for linux. > > Oh. Since this was brought up. Has anyone user such a beast on Linux. > I am just curious to see if the driver trying to cope with the crippled > Winmodem beast, is as resource hungry as it seems to be on Windows. One > would expect that emulating a "real" modem in the driver would cost a > few extra CPU cycles, or memory, or other system resources. DSP-based versions are not CPU hungry. See http://linmodems.org/ Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message