Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:08:36 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx@ua.ac.be> To: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com> Cc: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@withagen.nl> Subject: Re: spreading partitions over multiple drives Message-ID: <20040910210836.GA28469@lori.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040910164452.GE24453@luke.immure.com> References: <20040831133551.GA86660@lori.mine.nu> <4134B312.8030309@pacific.net.sg> <1093958674.680.2.camel@book> <20040831183908.GA87694@lori.mine.nu> <4141AA6A.2070802@withagen.nl> <20040910160051.GA24152@lori.mine.nu> <20040910164452.GE24453@luke.immure.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:44:52AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 06:00:51PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 03:21:46PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > > I would expect a bigger system to cache just about all file access > > > during 'make buildworld'. > > > Even when building things with -j 64 I can not get my dual-opteron 1Gb > > > system get without free pages. > > > And as such most files will only be read once, and object output will be > > > "slowly" synced on the disks. > > > Disk I/O rearly becomes the bottleneck, most of the time I'm missing raw > > > CPU cycles. > > > And I have everything on 1 large 200Gb disk. > > > > Ok so adding more RAM may be more useful than an extra harddisk? Maybe > > I could even put /tmp or /usr/obj on a RAM-disk? A fully built /usr/obj > > is about 350Mb. > > Hmm, how to you follow the prescribed process of rebooting between the > buildworld/installkernel and installworld if you put /usr/obj on a RAM > disk? Following the reboot you'll have no objects to install. > > Bob Oops! :-) GH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040910210836.GA28469>