From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 11 22:31:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA04643 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (cisco-ts15-line11.uoregon.edu [128.223.150.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA04632 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA16761; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 22:30:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: "Sean T. Lamont .." cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I/O memory conflict with PCI In-Reply-To: <199709110034.RAA21643@itchy.serv.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Sep 1997, Sean T. Lamont .. wrote: > > Hi there. I have an odd memory conflict I'm trying to resolve. > > We've been running our news server for some time on dual adaptec 2940 > (narrow) controllers. Aside from that, we have an NE2000-compatible ethernet > on 0x280,5,0xd80000. Is there an extra 0 there, or am I reverting to DOS-isms? NE2000's do really use IOMEM anyway, so you could set it to 0x0 even and it might actually work. What brand & model? I have setup progs for popular NE2000s and might be able to supply one. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major Spam routed to /dev/null by Procmail | Death to Cyberpromo