Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 12:42:52 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.openssl.mk Message-ID: <20040512194252.GA22954@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <40A20B03.5070408@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200405120458.i4C4wrWL073057@repoman.freebsd.org> <40A20B03.5070408@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:31:15PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Dirk Meyer wrote: >=20 > >dinoex 2004/05/11 21:58:53 PDT > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > Mk bsd.openssl.mk=20 > > Log: > > - Don't build with openssl port when base version is stale > > PR: 66007 >=20 > It seems that now *every* port that uses USE_OPENSSL depends on > security/openssl, no matter what is in the base. Is this intended? I think the removal of WITH_OPENSSL_BASE was unintentional. Dirk, please test your bsd.*.mk commits thoroughly before committing and/or post your changes for review, because they impact a lot of ports. Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAon47Wry0BWjoQKURAiJrAJ97+QBLE3FmMLkQ8kiVqjlSSqTwVQCg07Tm AEqzd5xkat/Odr0vEYJVpPA= =K+Zz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040512194252.GA22954>