Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 07:09:38 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, unknown@riverstyx.net, Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! Message-ID: <19990316070938.A14219@titan.klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <19990316093202.M429@lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 09:32:02AM %2B1030 References: <19990314184616.G20826@orcrist.mediacity.com> <Pine.LNX.4.04.9903141857450.18595-100000@hades.riverstyx.net> <19990315171320.Y429@lemis.com> <19990315190522.B3020@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <19990316093202.M429@lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 09:32:02AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > > If I got the same results, it might only indicate that I didn't have > the Linux know-how to do better. I'd be afraid to publish my results > as a categorical statement: I'd rather ask the Linux people "What am I > doing wrong here?". As you perhaps read in another mail ... the point was, that Linux 2.0.36 SMP capabilities are something for /dev/null. In FreeBSD we had immediately very good results. Seems to be, that in Linux the way was a bit harder or in the last minute they deceided not to include further stuff into the 2.0.x kernel. Now we are "only" 19% better comparing the 2.2.3 kernel with our 3.1-STABLE. This certainly sounds better for your ears ;-) -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms Linux 2.2.3 by 19% ;-) See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990316070938.A14219>