From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 10 11:23:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8411599C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 11:12:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com) Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA29288; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 11:12:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sef) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 11:12:29 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Eric Fagan Message-Id: <199912101912.LAA29288@kithrup.com> To: current@freebsd.org Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired! In-Reply-To: <6332.944849983.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> References: Your message of "Fri, 10 Dec 1999 11:15:46 MST." <199912101815.LAA20053@mt.sri.com> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <6332.944849983.kithrup.freebsd.current@critter.freebsd.dk> PHK writes: > >Maybe we should put a special marker in -currents sendmail and >reject all email to the current list if they don't originate >from such a system. > >I'll tell you in case you can't figure out the answer to that rather >simple question: You're annoying people and wasting developer >time. That's what. And further evidence that FreeBSD is turning into PHKBSD: what PHK wants, despite objections from other people, PHK does, and damn any consequences, whether they be social, political, or technical. Several people have raised valid objections to PHK's actions (again -- at least he bothered warning people this time), and have proposed an alternate solution, which PHK has ignored (again -- at least this time he bothered saying so). And, once again, PHK's response is: shut up and go away. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message