From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 14:56:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3781065678 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shildret@scotth.emsphone.com) Received: from scotth.emsphone.com (scotth.emsphone.com [199.67.51.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842998FC19 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scotth.emsphone.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scotth.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5NEuI5h090673; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:56:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from shildret@scotth.emsphone.com) Received: (from shildret@localhost) by scotth.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5NEuINQ090672; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:56:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from shildret@scotth.emsphone.com) From: "Scott T. Hildreth" To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <4C219FB8.6000409@freebsd.org> References: <1276095204.75742.5.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> <1277244151.44361.5.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> <4C219FB8.6000409@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:56:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1277304978.90575.3.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-gnome Subject: Re: evolution core dumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:56:19 -0000 On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 01:46 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On 6/22/10 6:02 PM, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 09:53 -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > >> I don't know why I can't upgrade without have problems with evoltuion, > >> it always seems to happen me :-) I compiled evolution with debugging= =20 > >> symbols, here is the back trace : > >> > >> #0 0x498d58a3 in g_slice_get_config () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.= 0.so.0 > >> #1 0x498d6b16 in g_slice_alloc () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.= 0 > >> #2 0x498d6c25 in g_slice_alloc0 () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so= .0 > >> #3 0x498649c7 in g_type_create_instance () from /usr/local/lib/libgob= ject-2.0.so.0 > >> #4 0x49848902 in g_object_set () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.s= o.0 > >> #5 0x49848e18 in g_object_newv () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.= so.0 > >> #6 0x49849e1c in g_object_new () from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.s= o.0 > >> #7 0x482fa8c9 in filter_element_clone (element=3D0x52a2faa0) at e-fil= ter-element.c:70 > >> #8 0x482fb86f in e_filter_element_clone (element=3D0x52a2faa0) at e-f= ilter-element.c:369 > >> #9 0x482ff8f9 in e_filter_part_clone (part=3D0x517d2d80) at e-filter-= part.c:283 > >> #10 0x48301020 in filter_rule_load_set (node=3D0x51ea8980, rule=3D0x4f= 28ab00, context=3D0x4f2e6ad0) at e-filter-rule.c:330 > >> #11 0x483018d9 in filter_rule_xml_decode (rule=3D0x4f28ab00, node=3D0x= 51ea8780, context=3D0x4f2e6ad0) at e-filter-rule.c:548 > >> #12 0x4a04c21a in xml_decode (fr=3D0x4f28ab00, node=3D0x51ea8780, rc= =3D0x4f2e6ad0) at em-filter-rule.c:272 > >> #13 0x48303096 in e_filter_rule_xml_decode (rule=3D0x4f28ab00, node=3D= 0x51ea8780, context=3D0x4f2e6ad0) at e-filter-rule.c:996 > >> #14 0x4830429a in rule_context_load (context=3D0x4f2e6ad0, system=3D0x= 4fedeb00 "/usr/local/share/evolution/2.30/filtertypes.xml",=20 > >> user=3D0x4fedeac0 "/home/shildret/.evolution/mail/filters.xml") at= e-rule-context.c:285 > >> #15 0x483052a2 in e_rule_context_load (context=3D0x4f2e6ad0, system=3D= 0x4fedeb00 "/usr/local/share/evolution/2.30/filtertypes.xml",=20 > >> user=3D0x4fedeac0 "/home/shildret/.evolution/mail/filters.xml") at= e-rule-context.c:640 > >> #16 0x4a081fcd in main_get_filter_driver (session=3D0x4a34ae08, type= =3D0x4a0a0776 "incoming", ex=3D0x0) at mail-session.c:529 > >> #17 0x4a0789a8 in do_call (m=3D0x4ef10998) at mail-mt.c:762 > >> #18 0x4a078bca in mail_call_main (type=3DMAIL_CALL_p_ppp, func=3D0x4a0= 81f40 ) at mail-mt.c:817 > >> #19 0x4a0822ed in get_filter_driver (session=3D0x4a34ae08, type=3D0x4a= 0a0776 "incoming", ex=3D0x0) at mail-session.c:598 > >> #20 0x4834fd9f in camel_session_get_filter_driver () from /usr/local/l= ib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.14 > >> #21 0x4a079bc1 in mail_fetch_mail (source=3D0x4f73c3d0 "mbox:///var/ma= il/shildret;filter", keep=3D0, type=3D0x4a0a0776 "incoming",=20 > >> cancel=3D0x4fede940, get_folder=3D0x4a07ff50 ,= get_data=3D0x4fede900, status=3D0x4a07fc60 ,=20 > >> status_data=3D0x4fede900, done=3D0x4a07fd30 , data= =3D0x4fede900) at mail-ops.c:409 > >> #22 0x4a080f6c in mail_receive_uri (uri=3D0x4e45ef10 "mbox:///var/mail= /shildret;filter", keep_on_server=3D0) at mail-send-recv.c:1224 > >> #23 0x4a08082e in auto_timeout (data=3D0x4ed37c20) at mail-send-recv.c= :1058 > >> #24 0x498b9016 in g_source_get_current_time () from /usr/local/lib/lib= glib-2.0.so.0 > >> #25 0x498b8817 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/local/lib/libgl= ib-2.0.so.0 > >> #26 0x498bc05e in g_main_context_check () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-= 2.0.so.0 > >> #27 0x498bc467 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.s= o.0 > >> #28 0x49048494 in gtk_main () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > >> #29 0x0804a6eb in main (argc=3D1, argv=3D0xbfbfc254) at main.c:578 > >> 50 , get_data=3D0x4fede900, status=3D0x4a07fc60 ,=20 > >> status_data=3D0x4fede900, done=3D0x4a07fd30 , data= =3D0x4fede900) at mail-ops.c:409 > >> #22 0x4a080f6c in mail_receive_uri (uri=3D0x4e45ef10 "mbox:///var/mail= /shildret;filter", keep_on_server=3D0) at mail-send-recv.c:1224 > >> #23 0x4a08082e in auto_timeout (data=3D0x4ed37c20) at mail-send-recv.c= :1058 > >> #24 0x498b9016 in g_source_get_current_time () from /usr/local/lib/lib= glib-2.0.so.0 > >> #25 0x498b8817 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/local/lib/libgl= ib-2.0.so.0 > >> #26 0x498bc05e in g_main_context_check () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-= 2.0.so.0 > >> #27 0x498bc467 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.s= o.0 > >> #28 0x49048494 in gtk_main () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > >> #29 0x0804a6eb in main (argc=3D1, argv=3D0xbfbfc254) at main.c:578 > >> > >> I'm sure I need to recompile something, just not sure what. Is this h= elpful or do I need to compile > >> data-server with debugging symbols? > >=20 > > I have recompiled the evo data-server with debugging symbols, but I > > still get the same back trace. I'm not sure what to do at this point. > > I have had a core dump with libgtkhtml, here is part of the bt, > >=20 > > #0 0x4851534e in html_text_slave_get_glyph_items () from /usr/local/li= b/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19 > > #1 0x48516d58 in hts_calc_width () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14= .so.19 > > #2 0x48516f3d in html_text_slave_real_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib= /libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19 > > #3 0x484f9670 in html_object_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkht= ml-3.14.so.19 > > #4 0x484c7bca in html_clue_flow_real_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/= libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19 > > #5 0x484f9670 in html_object_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkht= ml-3.14.so.19 > > #6 0x484c9cf1 in html_cluev_do_layout () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkhtm= l-3.14.so.19 > > #7 0x484f9670 in html_object_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkht= ml-3.14.so.19 > > #8 0x484c9cf1 in html_cluev_do_layout () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkhtm= l-3.14.so.19 > > #9 0x484f9670 in html_object_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkht= ml-3.14.so.19 > > #10 0x484e37aa in html_engine_calc_size () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkht= ml-3.14.so.19 > > #11 0x484b9801 in size_allocate () from /usr/local/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.= so.19 > >=20 > > any suggestions? >=20 > You need to rebuild gtkhtml3 with debugging symbols, but it really looks > like a font problem. What font are you using?=20 I am using sans (9). I haven't seen the gtkhtml dump in a while, most my core dumps are the filter. I ran evo with the CAMEL_DEBUG=3Dall, but that didn't have any related info. Do you think one of my filters is causing this? Thanks. > Can you try a different > font? >=20 > Joe >=20