From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 15:21:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77B63BE86A for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BfcW01FDjz4559 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.112.48]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MmkfQ-1kuqlV07y2-00jtxz; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:21:27 +0200 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:21:26 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" Cc: Ralf Mardorf , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (very OT) Ideal partition schemes (history of partitioning) Message-Id: <20200830172126.5332f0eb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20200830083908.c7cc67a23306c90d51f5e446@sohara.org> References: <20200829154417.8dd5f83d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200830085848.68ab4832@archlinux> <20200830083908.c7cc67a23306c90d51f5e446@sohara.org> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:lAhxhTv5A8crbyUfsYqSvqkNsIgUy7FJU+8uK3N6eXXvBv549LJ D6DsrsH2u8+59H7wd+F4Zzqdsyx/9mHMzSmuPMNo5KkyMIT9CodIThyrH+0uLF4ABa5djpd nyL0fsvgP+waHajMwbivpfqt050P8XclawGCanpKtr2rQm6GtpHsDcJQom38mQyFrybOAul V92Z42RgV7DyrFE9rL2GA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:4ECK0hsyST8=:4K+QJFd1ytQv3XxzGexSGA PKAcQiFtHUBn1NodMMmFFKv9+lUcm0IwFHnHduiVvX1nMEZvd1MD9iAYEL97xJVI30avxjZpC 8OyqD+Y4mU6h+1ZTGHmRr88Lk6TdbmCwg6KEdkCUOva1CFdhSyT0sxxfb1JyMDtG6w7oIBG3Z ddeL5n0/RSpYQsnoB5kIFdT25wAVhdZNvdLpQp/UT+m+XHMvxCEYY02LdZWqGUTDnDROohvZV Oa2WHukMmXDEz/PdQBtHFzMUHycUGeSbFYAy1VP7kXq87Wd2hKHIOZboX2HaKjzUtHMC/b7df AuDp/jTNytUhLPfEqCMTqPAgPG5tm4Jnl88Yz3KBVZYrtpmvTwKpalcDC9uquyJE6ukirgejG 1sM+JDL7m9E69HgaUmFTn4mP2xicijmsW5sSbz8xE/qJx2aNCjXi7ebnY5eLSYsKgb6Gbk5v9 V9HAgl3oQ+9TXsEZV2ELiv41kRzfJ3pw5FG59hHsdVCUrXtdzTzymqSSEIpS7IlrcAHitJfWB LbzWsTp2sPiijZRj5Noc00vvRjGGtlbRMhP5nY2FGJfU3N6zmwO98WnzoClfnYcw+U54Nj/gL ASs14C+DAuE1gmfQGy8Ew5xWDSJsGHWdwQGSkFc+ks7cOP+1hxZZGG8ViS/R2fHYz9hVKwYTl tmd2o/hrZxEOIEksTNYPPHYGv/wb+Z/zPaDbysikkWBjr7zOtyS/WOdQxSOJl9Yz4FarV2ztd OUm2gI6NbrU37v8GfUB8VQ/DiBn/Bn7piiVJ8h7Sd+Vglq7aQXc/DBNgzY/aW+NSpJNf18zOs 6rU2A2dVzUjyeM7nKjX9hhUDNKD17JRkwMEEmA/dLqlh2QJfFfGudbtcRbGZ8wvTFeDkXCB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfcW01FDjz4559 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.17.13) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.31 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[178.12.112.48:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.00)[-0.005]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.28)[0.275]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.64)[0.637]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.17.13:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.17.13:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:21:33 -0000 On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:39:08 +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:58:48 +0200 > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > There's no need to take 10 shots/second of a still life and to repeat > > it 20 times, to end up with 200 photos. > > No there isn't, taking many shots and selecting the best has of > course long been standard practice for professional photographers digital > cameras and modern memory sizes just make it possible to carry this to > extremes. Rule: "Better have 100 photos and select 10 good ones, instead of having only 10 photos which are all crap." ;-) In digital photography, this is much more simple and convenient than in the "developing times", especially as you can delete the 90 photos not needed anymore - yes, they _can_ be deleted. But with cheap storage options available for few $, it seems to have become more common to just move the unneeded photos to a "secondary location", "Just in case!", which sometimes will never happen... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...