Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:08:32 +0100
From:      "Markie" <markie@notwentytwo.freeserve.co.uk>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: how to aggregate rules using ipfw2 ? Follow-up, Why Aggregate?
Message-ID:  <007701c2f6de$ff1739c0$f300a8c0@mrblossom>
References:  <20030330201632.R65324-100000@mail.cgu.chel.su> <001301c2f6d8$fbe36db0$f300a8c0@mrblossom> <1543.192.168.0.1.1049043311.squirrel@sigfried>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
More efficient in the way of typing (less of it) :) and I find it easier to
read. That's just my personal opinion though.
Can't say whether there's any speed improvement though, because I just don't
know.

Markie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Sotham" <joe@dubium.com>
To: "Markie" <markie@notwentytwo.freeserve.co.uk>;
<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc: <@>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: how to aggregate rules using ipfw2 ? Follow-up, Why Aggregate?


>
> Markie said:
>
> <snip>
> > ipfw add allow ip from any to { 192.168.0.0/16 or 10.0.0.0/8 }
>
> Why aggregate?  Is it more efficient?
>
> --
> Joe Sotham
> ------------
> If the only prayer you say in your entire life is "Thank You",
> that will suffice.
>         - Meister Eckhart
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?007701c2f6de$ff1739c0$f300a8c0>