From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 12 04:24:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A9216A420;
	Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:24:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B379B43D1F;
	Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:24:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 5AD4F278C; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:24:06 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:24:06 -0500
To: obrien@freebsd.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>,
	Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050612042406.GB5996@soaustin.net>
References: <20050609234619.AD1F67306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<p0621025fbeceac0673f8@128.113.24.47>
	<84dead720506091950779d1661@mail.gmail.com>
	<86oeae3d8f.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050610071828.GB78035@ip.net.ua>
	<867jh23bwh.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050610074706.GE78035@ip.net.ua>
	<20050612022105.GB67746@dragon.NUXI.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050612022105.GB67746@dragon.NUXI.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:48:19 +0000
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:24:07 -0000

> I tried.  But Kris refused to consider the following for committing.
> The problem is something like 3 ports will not build with
> "-fno-strict-aliasing".  Those are the gcc28, gnat[*] ports.
> 
> [*] I really don't understand why we have a GCC 2.8 based Ada compiler
> when Ada has been a native part of GCC since version 3.1...

If these ports are useless, why don't we mark them DEPRECATED and
after a decent interval, get rid of them?

In this day and age, anyone who's on gcc27 or gcc28 is hopelessly
behind anyways.  I can't imagine that with the long-established
track record of gcc295 there is any reason to keep them.

mcl