From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu May 28 17:07:22 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA29373
          for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 17:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA29237;
          Thu, 28 May 1998 17:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jmb)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199805290006.RAA29237@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Better luck with PPro 166 or 180 at 200 MHz?
In-Reply-To: <199805282231.SAA04504@lucy.bedford.net> from CyberPeasant at "May 28, 98 06:31:17 pm"
To: djv@bedford.net
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 17:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: alk@pobox.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

CyberPeasant wrote:
> Tony Kimball wrote:
> > 
> > I'm trying to decide whether to get a pair of 166 or 180 MHz PPro's.
> > Which has a better probability of running at 200MHz, a pair of
> > 166MHz 512k cache, or a pair of 180MHz 256k cache?
> > 
> A pair of 200MHz running at 200MHz is your best bet :)
> (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

	i would have guessed two PPro 166MHz 512kB cache overclocked.
	arent these chips supposed to be wonderful for overclocking.
	the doubled cache must be worth more than the 20% increase
	in clock rate.
jmb

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message