From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 9 14:25:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sage-american.com (sage-american.com [216.122.141.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863A737B40C for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sageone (ppp-208-191-235-173.dialup.crchtx.swbell.net [208.191.235.173]) by sage-american.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA05892; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:25:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20011009162602.031a30f0@mail.sage-american.com> X-Sender: jacks@mail.sage-american.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 16:26:02 -0500 To: Matt Sykes , Erik Trulsson From: jacks@sage-american.com Subject: Re: cvsup not useful? Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <16413275.1002662158200.JavaMail.imail@patti.excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ...you also need to add a "refuse" file so you don't download unneeded stuff.... At 02:15 PM 10.9.2001 -0700, Matt Sykes wrote: > >On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 22:44:14 +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 01:27:20PM -0700, Matt Sykes wrote: >> > >> > Sure, I should have posted this before. >> > >> > >> > *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org >> > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup >> > *default prefix=/usr/local >> > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 >> > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress >> > src-sbin >> > src-sys >> > src-usrsbin >> > >> > I tried different cvs servers; still had the errors. >> >> Since you are only cvsupping something like 20% of the sources that is >> not surprising. >> Replace >> src-sbin >> src-sys >> src-usrsbin >> with >> src-all >> and see if thing won't work better. > >But I don't have the bandwith nor the hard disk space >to get everything. Granted that gigs are cheap nowadays, >if 'src-all' is the only option which is valid then why >all the other options? If I get just src/sbin, I should >be able to build src/bin. If this is not the case, then >there shouldn't be a 'src-sbin' option. > >Whether 'src-all' fixes the problem or not (I will know >in a few hours), there is still the issue of src-sbin >not compiling. > >Allowing users to get only portions they need eases the >load on our precious and strained freebsd servers. > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________________ >Send a cool gift with your E-Card >http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Server Admin Sage-American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message