From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  7 21:19:25 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D6716A46C;
	Thu,  7 Jun 2007 21:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2619413C44B;
	Thu,  7 Jun 2007 21:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id l57LJN3j007796; 
	Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]);
	Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070607210313.GA603@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0706071717580.28966@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <20070604162430.GA76813@freebsd.org>
	<896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A7F@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com>
	<20070606074429.GA42032@freebsd.org> <4666F0FB.8020101@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070607070455.GA71012@freebsd.org>
	<896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A84@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com>
	<20070607210313.GA603@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Eric Lemar <eric.lemar@isilon.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:19:25 -0000

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:

>
> now we need some strong opinion what to do. can anyone step up and tell "do this and
> that"? I am willing to adjust my patch with either the wrapping idea and/or the flags thing.
>
> I just need someone to tell me what is the preferred way.

Have you verified that these functions (the way you have named
and implemented them) conform to the draft POSIX spec?

-- 
DE