From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Thu Jan  4 23:40:51 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20280EC0972
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu,  4 Jan 2018 23:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org)
Received: from onager.schwarzes.net (onager.schwarzes.net
 [IPv6:2a03:4000:8:2bb::5d22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DAD6789F
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu,  4 Jan 2018 23:40:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org)
Received: from [172.30.250.35] (x4dbb0574.dyn.telefonica.de [77.187.5.116])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by onager.schwarzes.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id w04NelkC008460
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 2018 00:40:47 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from freebsd.asc@strcmp.org)
From: Andreas Schwarz <freebsd.asc@strcmp.org>
To: Freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Mail-Reply-To: Andreas Schwarz <freebsd.asc@strcmp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:40:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4b428a608dd.290862fc@mail.schwarzes.net>
In-Reply-To: <65D7B16B-E3D7-40F2-BE60-0EE5E5B26B31@dsl-only.net>
References: <65D7B16B-E3D7-40F2-BE60-0EE5E5B26B31@dsl-only.net>
User-Agent: YAM/2.9p1 (MorphOS; PPC; rv:20140418r7798)
Subject: Re: Times to build just devel/llvm50 via poudriere-devel: Pine64+
 2GB, RPi3, RPi2 V1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2
 (onager.schwarzes.net [37.221.194.76]); Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:40:47 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 23:40:51 -0000

On 04.01.18, Mark Millard wrote:

> eMCC performance notes:
> The rpi3 can get between 10 MiByte/s and
> 12 MiByte/s, while the Pine64+ 2GB can get
> between 5 MiBytes/s and 6 MiBytes/s, from
> what I have observed.

Unfortunatly the DiskIO (to SD Card) of the Pine64 is very slow 
in comparsion to RPI2B (or RPI3).

root@rpi2b:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/zero.img bs=1m count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes transferred in 80.823823 secs (13284967 bytes/sec)

root@pine64plus:~ # dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/zero.img bs=1m count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes transferred in 383.600722 secs (2799113 bytes/sec)

Both devices running r327391 with without any debugging, INVARIANTS, 
etc.. Used SD Cards: Samsung MB-MGBGB SDHC 32GB

Mark, can you perform the write test with your eMMC to MicroSD 
Adapter?

-asc